From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:28:26 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] New environment code In-Reply-To: <4C42190B.8060102@emk-elektronik.de> References: <1279395948-25864-1-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <4C42190B.8060102@emk-elektronik.de> Message-ID: <201007171728.27716.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Saturday, July 17, 2010 16:56:43 Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Disadvantages: > > > > - Image size grows by typically 5...7 KiB (might shrink a bit again on > > > > systems with redundant environment with a following patch series) > > Looking at the patches I can't really see where that large increase in > image size comes from; > but if its really true, it seems to be a very high price to pay for > those who get along with the environment as it is. i wonder if we could #ifdef the sorting/hashing. i tend to agree with Reinhard that it is very common for boards to be deployed with a small env, so i wonder if the normal runtime experience is actually faster, or if the difference is about the same as system noise: boot u-boot, load env with ~20 entries, read a few env vars, boot OS. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20100717/f2dfacfc/attachment.pgp