From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob8NV-0007DI-RJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:40:49 +0200 Received: from guest185.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de ([134.169.35.185] helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1Ob8NH-0003bl-L0 by authid with cram_md5 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:40:30 +0200 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob8NG-0003rz-UM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:40:27 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:40:26 +0200 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> References: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> <20100720070108.GE1512@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:40:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:09, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 20-07-10 09:01, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > > From the silence on this topic I gather that the interest to create a new branch > > or change the process is quite low. > > I have an interest in a new stable branch, but no interest in changing > the process. Fair enough. Lets handle the issues seperately for now. > The biggest problem is the .dev is halfway into big changes, e.g. > halfway into new-style staging, Agreed. While I think we are more then halfway through with this. Recipes are left but most of the active maintained are already done. NO numbers but my feeling here. > halfway into packaged-staging rework, halfway into nativesdk, etc. These both are ongoing for quite some time already. I have to admit that I lost track where they stand and what is still outstanding. So your suggestion is to wait until all three are done? regards Stefan Schmidt