All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:17:40 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100720201740.GE6227@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100720200729.GD6227@lenovo>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:07:29AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
...
> > 
> > But first question is, is it always !smp_processor_id()? At least
> > current implementation indicates this:
> > 
> 
> I guess so, since it's assigned from boot_cpu_id iirc
> 

well, not true, this id is being set in setup_per_cpu_areas()
note the snippet

		if (cpu == boot_cpu_id)
			switch_to_new_gdt(cpu);

but cycle of assignment is done over all possible cpus so
smp_processor_id will be = 0 for BP but definitely it's
confusing and better to check for BP via explicit cpu == boot_cpu_id
I think. Though I might be missing something.

> >  void __cpuinit identify_secondary_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> >  {
> >  	BUG_ON(c == &boot_cpu_data);
> >  	...
> > 
> > with:
> > 
> >  #define boot_cpu_data cpu_data[0]
> > 
> > ... which is valid for 32 and 64 bit.
> >
 
	-- Cyrill

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-20 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-20 18:50 [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86, xsave: do not include asm/i387.h in asm/xsave.h Robert Richter
2010-07-20 21:46   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86, xsave: 32/64 bit boot cpu check unification in initialization Robert Richter
2010-07-20 21:47   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-21  0:40   ` [tip:x86/xsave] " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86: removing boot_cpu_id variable Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86, xsave: moving boot cpu initialization to xsave_init() Robert Richter
2010-07-20 21:48   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-21  0:40   ` [tip:x86/xsave] x86, xsave: Move " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86, xsave: make xsave_cntxt_init() static Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:20   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-21 13:48     ` Robert Richter
2010-07-21 16:15       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86, xsave: do not initialize xsave in fpu_init() Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:21   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86, xsave: reduce cpu_has_xsave checks Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:22   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86, xsave: introduce xstate enable functions Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:23   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86, xsave: check cpuid level for XSTATE_CPUID (0x0d) Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:26   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 22:45     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-20 22:51     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86, xsave: make init_xstate_buf static Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:26   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 19:27 ` [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-20 19:46   ` Robert Richter
2010-07-20 20:05     ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 20:07     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-20 20:17       ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-07-21 16:16         ` Robert Richter
2010-07-21 16:29           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 16:32         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-21 16:52           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 17:01             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 17:11               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-21 17:17                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 17:24                   ` Robert Richter
2010-07-21 17:37                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 19:14                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-20 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100720201740.GE6227@lenovo \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.