From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc6
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:22:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723122213.GA689@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723112142.f698394e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:26:13 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> I actually hope/think that this is going to be the last -rc. Things
> > have been pretty quiet, and while this -rc has more commits than -rc5
> > had, it's not by a large amount, nor does it look scary to me. So
> > there doesn't seem to be any point in dragging out the release any
> > more, unless we find something new that calls for it.
>
> I have no idea how important this stuff is, but I still have the
> following in linux-next that are (in theory) destined for v2.6.35:
<snip>
Yes, there are a few minor USB patches in my tree (minor bugfixes and
new device ids) that I wanted to send to you, but no need to hold up a
.35 release.
We're still working on the network namespace sysfs issues, but if that
option is disabled, all works fine. I have 3 tiny patches to work to
resolve that problem in my tree, I can send them to you tonight if you
want.
But even there, nothing that should hold up .35 from release.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 19:26 Linux 2.6.35-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2010-07-23 1:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-23 12:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-07-23 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-24 8:06 ` Jiri Slaby
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-28 5:32 Donald Parsons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100723122213.GA689@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.