From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 4k sector drives
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:13:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723141341.GA3727@citd.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723155034.2a42ccd7@harpe.intellique.com>
On 23.07.2010 15:50, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:38:43 +0200
> Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de> écrivait:
>
> > Only for writes, reads are for practically unaffected.
>
> Sequential writes may be relatively unaffected too; if you write
> sequentially a couple of megabytes you'll have only a couple of
> additional blocks at the beginning and end of operation.
What MAY hurt, also for large writes, are the meta-data operations while
writing the file. (e.g. the file-size changes, journaling ...)
But i haven't tested that and can't say for sure how much that hurts.
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 10:33 4k sector drives Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-21 12:21 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-23 6:09 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-23 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 10:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-23 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 12:41 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-23 10:59 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-23 12:56 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-23 13:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-23 13:38 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2010-07-23 13:50 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-23 14:13 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer [this message]
2010-07-24 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-24 21:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-24 22:35 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-25 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-23 15:02 Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-23 15:28 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-23 9:19 Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-21 7:53 Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-21 9:14 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-21 10:33 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-20 18:58 Michael Monnerie
2010-07-20 20:30 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-20 20:39 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-20 21:34 ` Michael Monnerie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100723141341.GA3727@citd.de \
--to=ms@citd.de \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.