From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:30:50 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007231530.o6NFUog0031122@demeter.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-16312-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |axboe@kernel.dk,
| |jack@suse.cz
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-07-23 15:30:50 ---
I was looking into this. A trivial reproducer is:
mknod devzero c 1 5; touch devzero
Essentially, the problem is that any device inode can get dirty because of time
stamp update or similar reason but some BDIs (in this case the one backing
/dev/zero) do not expect dirty inodes. Hmm, I now have to think how to fix
this... It would be more natural if device inodes were queued for metadata
updates in the queues of "parent" filesystem. But this brings problem that
device inode would need to be in two queues - one for metadata update to the
parent filesystem and one for data writeout to the device (this is not exactly
the case of /dev/zero but if you have a device node for /dev/sdb on /dev/sda,
then this is exactly what we would need).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-28 17:47 [Bug 16312] New: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty bugzilla-daemon
2010-06-28 17:48 ` [Bug 16312] " bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-09 2:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-09 21:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-23 15:30 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2010-07-23 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-26 13:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-26 13:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-26 13:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-26 13:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-26 17:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-26 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 11:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 14:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 15:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 15:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 15:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-27 18:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-29 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-29 19:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-29 19:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-01 19:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-02 13:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-05 12:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-05 18:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-05 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-06 6:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-08-20 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-08 7:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-08 8:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-13 17:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-16 18:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-16 18:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-16 18:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-16 18:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-17 0:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-09-20 10:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-03 10:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-03 10:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-03 20:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-04 21:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-23 16:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-08 23:33 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:42 2.6.35-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-23 11:47 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:46 2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-01 13:52 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 22:57 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-13 11:42 ` Jan Kara
2010-09-13 11:42 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20100913114229.GA4016-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-13 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-13 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:54 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:57 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 21:29 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20100920212955.GB14020-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-20 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:29 2.6.36-rc5-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-26 20:33 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:36 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:53 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-10 19:10 2.6.36-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-10 19:18 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:53 2.6.36-rc8-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-17 20:55 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007231530.o6NFUog0031122@demeter.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.