From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:39:25 +0200
Message-ID: <20100723183925.GC7603@aepfle.de>
References: <20100723121917.GE3540@aepfle.de>
	<19529.51415.973935.754110@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <19529.51415.973935.754110@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Jul 23, Ian Jackson wrote:

> Olaf Hering writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header"):
> > Default-Enabled: is not a LSB keyword.
> > Move it out of the LSB section to avoid an openSuSE buildcheck warning.
> 
> I'm pretty sure it was put there for a reason by the people who added
> these files.  If we move it out of the INIT INFO section it's probably
> going to stop working.

Its not clear what the intention was, LSB does not mention this keyword.
Google has some hits about X-UnitedLinux-Default-Enabled: which implies
what someone tried to get rid of the vendor part from this old string
from end of 2002.
I'm sure nothing will break if the lines disappear.

> Is it actually a breach of the LSB spec to include nonstandard
> keywords ?

I havent checked if LSB forbids it. Most likely the tools should
tolerate unknown keywords.

Olaf