From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:43:17 +0200
Message-ID: <20100723184317.GA9102@aepfle.de>
References: <20100723121324.GB3540@aepfle.de>
	<19529.51008.134045.602693@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<20100723173620.GA7603@aepfle.de>
	<19529.55727.859057.248861@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <19529.55727.859057.248861@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Jul 23, Ian Jackson wrote:

> Olaf Hering writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script"):
> > This tells the insserv program to create a symlink in the specified
> > runlevels. xdm for example has only '5', because X11 is only supposed to
> > be started in runlevel 5.
> 
> Yes, but the question is: do we want to start the watchdog by
> default ?  Previously we didn't.

Thats up to the packager of the binary package.

Or do you mean there should be no runlevel script in the first place?


Olaf