diff for duplicates of <20100726043709.GC7668@localhost> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 9adda67..f00a7c1 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -78,3 +78,7 @@ optimal.. Thanks, Fengguang +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in +the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index da44452..b102a2c 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ "..and don't need to be elaborated :)\n" "\n" "Thanks,\n" - Fengguang + "Fengguang\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-fsdevel\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -08c213d257c299e74e52b3c0659c9e314c33423699c1dd1a8d91701946622bbe +6e16adf96c7cf57f23d5f23daf4243be9cf8d8f8ced84c3f1dcc2d5bebada477
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 9adda67..f51003f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:11:59PM +0800, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> > and we need to know reproduce way and confirm it. > >> > > >> > At least, we need three confirms. -> >> > o original issue is still there? -> >> > o DEF_PRIORITY/3 is best value? +> >> > A o original issue is still there? +> >> > A o DEF_PRIORITY/3 is best value? > >> > >> I agree. Wu, how do you determine DEF_PRIORITY/3 of LRU? > >> I guess system has 512M and 22M writeback pages. @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ optimal.. > >> > >> I am not sure exactly what you mean but at least DEF_PRIOIRTY/3 seems to be > >> related to dirty_ratio. It always can be changed by admin. -> >> Then do we have to determine magic value(DEF_PRIORITY/3) proportional to dirty_ratio? +> >> Then do we have to determine magic value(DEF_PRIORITY/3) A proportional to dirty_ratio? > > > > Yes DEF_PRIORITY/3 is already proportional to the _default_ > > dirty_ratio. We could do explicit comparison with dirty_ratio @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ optimal.. Thanks, Fengguang + +-- +To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in +the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, +see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . +Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index da44452..4262ce5 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ "> >> > and we need to know reproduce way and confirm it.\n" "> >> >\n" "> >> > At least, we need three confirms.\n" - "> >> > \302\240o original issue is still there?\n" - "> >> > \302\240o DEF_PRIORITY/3 is best value?\n" + "> >> > A o original issue is still there?\n" + "> >> > A o DEF_PRIORITY/3 is best value?\n" "> >>\n" "> >> I agree. Wu, how do you determine DEF_PRIORITY/3 of LRU?\n" "> >> I guess system has 512M and 22M writeback pages.\n" @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ "> >>\n" "> >> I am not sure exactly what you mean but at least DEF_PRIOIRTY/3 seems to be\n" "> >> related to dirty_ratio. It always can be changed by admin.\n" - "> >> Then do we have to determine magic value(DEF_PRIORITY/3) \302\240proportional to dirty_ratio?\n" + "> >> Then do we have to determine magic value(DEF_PRIORITY/3) A proportional to dirty_ratio?\n" "> >\n" "> > Yes DEF_PRIORITY/3 is already proportional to the _default_\n" "> > dirty_ratio. We could do explicit comparison with dirty_ratio\n" @@ -103,6 +103,12 @@ "..and don't need to be elaborated :)\n" "\n" "Thanks,\n" - Fengguang + "Fengguang\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" + "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" + "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" + "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" -08c213d257c299e74e52b3c0659c9e314c33423699c1dd1a8d91701946622bbe +f8ac48530760ec99821777a9bb86a46315ea79fd33273c2a70a4b4a913216e55
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.