All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keld Simonsen <keld@keldix.com>
To: Marco <jjletho67-diar@yahoo.it>
Cc: Roman Mamedov <roman@rm.pp.ru>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid1 performance
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:24:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100726102406.GA8415@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23123.42111.qm@web28503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 09:37:20AM +0000, Marco wrote:
> 
> 
> >> doing a simple performance tests i obtained some very unexpected results: if
> >> i issue hdparm -t /dev/md2 i obtain 61 - 65 MB/s while issuing the same test 
> >> directly on the partitions which compose md2 (/dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb3) i
> >> obtain 84 - 87 MB/s. I didn't expect a so big difference between md2 and one
> >> of its member. What can cause  this difference ? 
> >
> >Maybe their read-ahead settings are different?
> >Check out "blockdev --getra /dev/md2", and compare that with the same
> >setting of the member disks. You can experiment with changing it by using
> >"--setra" as well.
> 
> Hi Roman,
> thank you for your hint, I verified the read-ahead settings and they are the 
> same for all the block devices involved in the test: the value is 256 for all 
> /dev/sd?? and for all /dev/md?
> there should be something else which is influencing  raid 1 performance.
> Have someone of you ever had a similar issue ?

Did you try:

# Set read-ahead.
echo "Setting read-ahead to 64 MiB for /dev/md3"
blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md3

Best regards
keld

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-26 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-25 14:58 raid1 performance Marco
2010-07-25 15:19 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-26  9:37   ` Marco
2010-07-26 10:24     ` Keld Simonsen [this message]
2010-07-26 10:53       ` John Robinson
2010-07-26 11:30         ` Keld Simonsen
2010-07-27 16:10       ` Marco
2010-07-26 11:03     ` Neil Brown
2010-07-27  1:23       ` Leslie Rhorer
2010-07-27 16:10       ` Marco
2010-07-27 22:23         ` Neil Brown
2010-07-28 12:10           ` Marco
2010-07-28 12:24             ` Neil Brown
2010-07-31 15:21           ` Marco
2010-07-31 16:04             ` Keld Simonsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-19 12:14 Marco
2004-04-21  5:57 RAID1: Performance Mike Mestnik
2002-04-30 12:23 raid1 performance Jaime Medrano
2002-04-30 12:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-04-30 14:21   ` Kent Borg
2002-05-01 16:35     ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-01 17:01       ` Kent Borg
2002-05-01 17:16         ` Justin Cormack
2002-05-01 21:23         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-05-02 16:37           ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-06-29  0:01             ` Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100726102406.GA8415@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@keldix.com \
    --cc=jjletho67-diar@yahoo.it \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman@rm.pp.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.