From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Odon1-0006c0-4y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:22:08 +0200 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so3728575bwz.6 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Zr4Di/MxoTU9YpLBIAmuiCADes81ilzO2E0bXr/lGoY=; b=X2M/LVID8O80SBRwfCKNa0xbMCWfjVGhsZd1k+qUI17/9MxbKW5LCCDob9lxfZ53Ey Ag1K8A97K+f8vBQtpte61TWXaCSWKwP5OgLYuJDVUR3mzPfHB5yDLTZMrFE+cKL9fOZJ TdFULrVeC1c+R0RI+KQDHRyOgVwmpyon9Y3J0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ii2ooby7xs3f4rQdNOx1umatM+721nx/APL/RY/5JRx4XEPJw/IKSlbkvUCgUES8UI sLz3oCcB5mkQ8LI103jU+mOlFxxEet2XCTwcY8BUtjb4m9BN6wyo7ZnmcpaVOcUxhzsF Jwpn6Z5hS1Jhx8bbZO75xkpBAC5w+YqzMzMcs= Received: by 10.204.33.86 with SMTP id g22mr7001307bkd.26.1280254911537; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-241-5.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.241.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f10sm4057725bkl.17.2010.07.27.11.21.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Odomc-0007jn-E7; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:21:42 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:21:42 +0200 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100727182142.GA29621@mx.loc> References: <20100717000603.GK23169@mx.loc> <1279373863.21888.10.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1279394951.21888.31.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1279394951.21888.31.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: busybox mdev X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:22:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:29:11PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >I'm not familiar with that recipe and I don't seem to have a >micro-base.bb in my tree. But, if it's sucking in udev, it sounds like >a bogus dependency somewhere. You can use bitbake -g to find out where. my bad, i ment micro-image. i'm doing this now locally, fwiw. cheers, diff --git a/conf/distro/micro.conf b/conf/distro/micro.conf index 26265a6..74989b5 100644 --- a/conf/distro/micro.conf +++ b/conf/distro/micro.conf @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ #@MAINTAINER: Martin Lund #@COMMENT: This distribution configuration defines a truely tiny OE Linux #@COMMENT: distribution. The matching buildable image target (micro-image) -#@COMMENT: basically consists of: libc, busybox, udev, sysv init, and a few +#@COMMENT: basically consists of: libc, busybox, sysv init, and a few #@COMMENT: init scripts for running up the system. ############################################################################# diff --git a/recipes/images/micro-image.bb b/recipes/images/micro-image.bb index c2cff93..19cb53b 100644 --- a/recipes/images/micro-image.bb +++ b/recipes/images/micro-image.bb @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ IMAGE_LINGUAS = "" IMAGE_LOGIN_MANAGER = "busybox" # Include minimum init and init scripts -IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "udev" +IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev" IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof" IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = "" > >p. > >On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 17:09 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> Baking micro-base (not -image) tries to build udev for me? >> >> On 17 Jul 2010 15:39, "Phil Blundell" wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 02:06 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> > (what's the reason micro-base u... >> Er, does it? My copy of micro-base-image.bb says: >> >> # Include minimum init and init scripts >> >> IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev" >> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof" >> IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = "" >> >> If it's using udev then that is definitely a bug. >> >> p.