From: Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:09:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007291009.42670.minimod@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100729163008.468a211e@surf>
On Thu July 29 2010, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:18:56 -0500
> "Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org> wrote:
>
> > mszick at wolf466:~$ lua
> > Lua 5.1.4 Copyright (C) 1994-2008 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> > > bye = function() return os.exit("String Value") end
> > > bye()
> > stdin:1: bad argument #1 to 'exit' (number expected, got string)
> > stack traceback:
> > [C]: in function 'exit'
> > stdin:1: in function 'bye'
> > stdin:1: in main chunk
> > [C]: ?
>
> With the current Buildroot git (i.e, without SJLJ exceptions), I built
> an ARM system with Lua, and made your test under Qemu. I had the exact
> same output, with the exact same stack trace.
>
> Are more complicated cases likely to make a difference ?
>
Unknown.
The prior tests where on MIPS-32, and limited in scope to the simple
tests included in this thread.
Mike
> Regards,
>
> Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 6:30 [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 10:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 11:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 11:59 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:18 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 15:09 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2010-07-29 15:11 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 12:34 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-07-29 12:47 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: remove multilib Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:53 ` [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Peter Korsgaard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-28 10:10 Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-28 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007291009.42670.minimod@morethan.org \
--to=minimod@morethan.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.