From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hsp-52.hspserver.com ([85.197.80.179]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OePdn-0007m8-VU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:43:05 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hsp-52.hspserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66886A2C457 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:42:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hsp-52.hspserver.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hsp-52.hspserver.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gmAbmCbkNHGD for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:42:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tomboy.localnet (pD9E177A6.dip.t-dialin.net [217.225.119.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hsp-52.hspserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D57D9A2C456 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:42:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Zimmermann To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:42:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-0.slh.11-sidux-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201007291142.30925.ml@vdm-design.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.197.80.179 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ml@vdm-design.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: OE recipe tree quality X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:43:06 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010, 10:50:53 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > Dear all, > > Given the discussions on quality that sometimes pop up (and also triggered > by Robert's message), I decided to kick off a bitbake -k world. > Below are some initial findings. I would like to use this as a starter to > kickoff the discusson on quality and what to do with broken stuff. > And also I hope that people who feel attached to a recipe mentioned below > will take action. > > My setting: > local.conf: > IMAGE_LINGUAS = "" > ENABLE_BINARY_LOCALE_GENERATION = "0" > > MACHINE = "beagleboard" > DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" > > EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2 = "--pad --eraseblock=0x20000" > MKUBIFS_ARGS = "-m 2048 -e 129024 -c 1024" > > IMAGE_FSTYPES = "tar squashfs ubifs jffs2" > IMAGE_KEEPROOTFS = "1" > OE_ALLOW_INSECURE_DOWNLOADS = "yes" > > I opted for angstromg and beagleboard as I feel this is the most often > build configuration, so it should have the least issues. > host is ubuntu 10.04 on 64 bit. tree is oe dev git head (as of jul 29) > > All results are not in yet (there are 71047 taksks, I am at 159 :-) > However the parsing already gave some interesting output. > I've ordered them somehwat: > > Nothing PROVIDES errors > =================== > ... Some of these 'Nothing PROVIDES' errors are because you are using angstrom as distro and some recipes are blacklisted there (e.g. fso-apm), because of that a lot of the shr specific recipes aren't buildable. I think one should do such a test with minimal distro because nothing is blacklisted there. Other recipes like etk or epsilon were moved to obsolete, but recipes depending on them weren't. So i think recipes depending on etk and epsilon can be moved to obsolete too. Regards Thomas