Re: [000/165] 2.6.32.17-rc1 -stable review

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 02:19:19AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:15:50 -0700
> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.17 release.
> > There are 165 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by August 1, 2010, 18:00:00 UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.32.17-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> 
> I still don't see this one in 2.6.32-stable:
> 
> commit 1f5a81e41f8b1a782c68d3843e9ec1bfaadf7d72 upstream.
> Subject: ext4: Make sure the MOVE_EXT ioctl can't overwrite append-only files
> 
> This fixes CVE-2010-2066; I'm pretty sure 2.6.32 is vulnerable.

Ick.  I have 40+ ext4 patches already in this release, and here we
didn't get one that really mattered :)

Ted, care to forward on the needed patch(s) to me?

thanks,

greg k-h