From: "George G. Davis" <gdavis@mvista.com>
To: Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@samsung.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GCOV doesn't seem to work on ARM with kernel 2.6.35-rc6
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 01:20:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100803052051.GA17719@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C51AB7F.70805@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3541 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:25:35PM +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 05:57 PM, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >On 28.07.2010 15:44, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> >>On 07/28/2010 03:12 PM, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >>>On 27.07.2010 09:35, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> >>>>On 07/26/2010 06:57 PM, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >>>>>Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> >>>>>>On 07/26/2010 12:32 PM, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> >>>>>>>I'm trying to use code coverage measurements with mainline Linux
> >>>>>>>kernel
> >>>>>>>2.6.35-rc6 on ARM platform (specifically on Samsung's S5PC110
> >>>>>>>board).
> >>>>...
> >>>>>I just tested gcov support for 2.6.35-rc6 on s390 and it works without
> >>>>>a problem. My assumption would be that you are using an EABI-GCC to
> >>>>>compile your kernel. Those compilers name their constructor symbols
> >>>>
> >>>>Exactly.
> >>>>
> >>>>>differently than the vanilla GCC so that the whole constructor calling
> >>>>>mechanism on which the gcov support relies, will fail. If that is
> >>>>>indeed the case, the following testing patch should solve your
> >>>>>problem:
> >>>>
> >>>>Yes, that was the case and your patch indeed solved my problem.
> >>>
> >>>Excellent. I could imagine that other ARM users might also benefit from
> >>>this patch. Before I submit it for integration though, I need to make
> >>>sure that it also works for kernel modules. Could you enable profiling
> >>>for a kernel module and verify that you are seeing files in
> >>>/sys/kernel/debug/gcov belonging to that module??
> >>
> >>That does work too.
> >>
> >>However, having seen this[x] patch I would ask if constructor name might
> >>be dynamically selected via user-(in)visible Kconfig option (like in
> >>that patch?) I've tested it and it does seem to work too.
> >>
> >>[x]
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/84439151c5386e0f/d7dbec62b9d7989f?show_docid=d7dbec62b9d7989f
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>I've copy pasted interesting parts from that patch below - I'm sure you
> >>get the idea.
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>--- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> >>+++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> >>@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@
> >>#ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
> >>#define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \
> >>VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_start) = .; \
> >>- *(.ctors) \
> >>+ *(CONFIG_GCOV_CTORS) \
> >
> >This should be named differently - gcov uses constructors but this
> >doesn't mean that constructors rely on gcov at all.
I actually changed that patch [x] long ago relative to the above but
haven't gotten around to following up with a new version and no one
has been anxious to reply about it since anyway. ; ) The original
version of [x] had a GCOV_CTORS depends on GCOV_KERNEL bug where
GCOV_KERNEL could be disabled resulting in a CONSTRUCTORS build
error due to undefined GCOV_CTORS. A new version of [x] is
attached below.
> >
> >>--- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
> >>+++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
> >>+config GCOV_CTORS
> >>+ string
> >>+ depends on GCOV_KERNEL
> >>+ default ".init_array" if ARM && AEABI
> >>+ default ".ctors"
> >
> >Is it guaranteed that gcc will only create EABI compliant object files
> >if CONFIG_AEABI is defined? I don't have personal experience with arm so
> >my previous assumption was that if you're using an EABI gcc, you would
> >always get EABI object code, no matter what the compiler options were.
>
> Honestly - I don't know. Maybe George - author of cited patch could
> explain this? (CC added).
Yes that is correct.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
George
>
> Thanks.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gcov-Add-ARM-eABI-support.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4550 bytes --]
>From 2a55028da8c8567de6a8223e753e1de440bb3e8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: George G. Davis <gdavis@mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:47:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gcov: Add ARM eABI support
Initially based on linux-2.6.30-gcov-arm-eabi.patch [1] and
linux-2.6.30-gcov-arm-hack.patch [2] with fixups to resolve
forward port conflicts. Improved on [1] by making the
constructors section name a kernel config variable so the
correct section name is automatically selected based on the
build target.
[1] http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/ltp/utils/analysis/gcov-kernel/linux-2.6.30-gcov-arm-eabi.patch?revision=1.1
[2] http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/ltp/utils/analysis/gcov-kernel/linux-2.6.30-gcov-arm-hack.patch?revision=1.1
Signed-off-by: David Singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <gdavis@mvista.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/bootp/Makefile | 2 ++
arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile | 2 ++
arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h | 1 +
arch/arm/kernel/module.c | 1 +
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 2 +-
init/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
kernel/gcov/Kconfig | 2 +-
kernel/module.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/bootp/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/bootp/Makefile
index c394e30..5761f00 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/bootp/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/bootp/Makefile
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
# architecture-specific flags and dependencies.
#
+GCOV_PROFILE := n
+
LDFLAGS_bootp :=-p --no-undefined -X \
--defsym initrd_phys=$(INITRD_PHYS) \
--defsym params_phys=$(PARAMS_PHYS) -T
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile
index 864a002..4ecb1ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ HEAD = head.o
OBJS = misc.o decompress.o
FONTC = $(srctree)/drivers/video/console/font_acorn_8x8.c
+GCOV_PROFILE := n
+
#
# Architecture dependencies
#
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h
index 51662fe..6b19f46 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ typedef struct user_fp elf_fpregset_t;
#define R_ARM_ABS32 2
#define R_ARM_CALL 28
#define R_ARM_JUMP24 29
+#define R_ARM_TARGET1 38
#define R_ARM_V4BX 40
#define R_ARM_PREL31 42
#define R_ARM_MOVW_ABS_NC 43
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
index c628bdf..2e04a98 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ apply_relocate(Elf32_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab, unsigned int symindex,
break;
case R_ARM_ABS32:
+ case R_ARM_TARGET1:
*(u32 *)loc += sym->st_value;
break;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
index 030a954..ef62639 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
#define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_start) = .; \
- *(.ctors) \
+ *(CONFIG_CTORS) \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_end) = .;
#else
#define KERNEL_CTORS()
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 5cff9a9..eb3ad6e 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ config CONSTRUCTORS
depends on !UML
default y
+config CTORS
+ string
+ depends on CONSTRUCTORS
+ default ".init_array" if ARM && AEABI
+ default ".ctors"
+
menu "General setup"
config EXPERIMENTAL
diff --git a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
index 70a298d..c62fb42 100644
--- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ config GCOV_KERNEL
config GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
bool "Profile entire Kernel"
depends on GCOV_KERNEL
- depends on S390 || X86 || (PPC && EXPERIMENTAL) || MICROBLAZE
+ depends on S390 || X86 || (PPC && EXPERIMENTAL) || MICROBLAZE || ARM
default n
---help---
This options activates profiling for the entire kernel.
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 6c56282..26885e1 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ static noinline struct module *load_module(void __user *umod,
"__kcrctab_unused_gpl");
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
- mod->ctors = section_objs(hdr, sechdrs, secstrings, ".ctors",
+ mod->ctors = section_objs(hdr, sechdrs, secstrings, CONFIG_CTORS,
sizeof(*mod->ctors), &mod->num_ctors);
#endif
--
1.6.3.3.334.g800a0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-03 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 10:32 GCOV doesn't seem to work on ARM with kernel 2.6.35-rc6 Karol Lewandowski
2010-07-26 10:37 ` Karol Lewandowski
2010-07-26 16:57 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2010-07-27 7:35 ` Karol Lewandowski
2010-07-28 13:12 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2010-07-28 13:44 ` Karol Lewandowski
2010-07-28 15:57 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2010-07-29 16:25 ` Karol Lewandowski
2010-08-03 5:20 ` George G. Davis [this message]
2010-08-03 9:12 ` Peter Oberparleiter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100803052051.GA17719@mvista.com \
--to=gdavis@mvista.com \
--cc=k.lewandowsk@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.