From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tracy Reed <treed@ultraviolet.org>
Subject: Re: why does btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"?
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:53:03 -0700
Message-ID: <20100803065303.GI32642@tracyreed.org>
References: <AANLkTimca-wn6wDpENT9t8gTdgFzPXv3uzhtaaHeuySf@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q59ABw34pTSIagmi"
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Wang Shaoyan <stufever@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimca-wn6wDpENT9t8gTdgFzPXv3uzhtaaHeuySf@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>


--Q59ABw34pTSIagmi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:27:32AM +0800, Wang Shaoyan spake thusly:
> As far as I know, btrfs comes from "btree file system", but why does
> btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"?

Because fat and greasy is attractive and encourages adoption of the
filesystem. I'm hoping we can get RMS to be the butter-eff-ess
spokesman.

--=20
Tracy "that's a joke, son" Reed
http://tracyreed.org

--Q59ABw34pTSIagmi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFMV7zPBhSTPg0d/nQRAjEUAJ9lTuCCJ1dkWzhqU+UG3Vrf79hkJACg2Gue
YipZlSJ3SQ/wFILm2pItotg=
=mUo2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Q59ABw34pTSIagmi--