From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:28:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201008031128.02437.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201008022351.31406.rjw@sisk.pl> <201008022354.46369.rjw@sisk.pl> <4C5766F2.4010605@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C5766F2.4010605@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hidetoshi Seto Cc: Jesse Barnes , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Kenji Kaneshige , Matthew Garrett List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, August 03, 2010, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > (2010/08/03 6:54), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Introduce a function allowing the caller to check if PCIe AER should > > be enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > --- > (snip) > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c > > @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ void pci_no_aer(void) > > pcie_aer_disable = 1; /* has priority over 'forceload' */ > > } > > > > +bool pci_aer_available(void) > > +{ > > + return !pcie_aer_disable && pci_msi_enabled(); > > +} > > + > > static int set_device_error_reporting(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data) > > { > > bool enable = *((bool *)data); > > @@ -411,9 +416,7 @@ static void aer_error_resume(struct pci_ > > */ > > static int __init aer_service_init(void) > > { > > - if (pcie_aer_disable) > > - return -ENXIO; > > - if (!pci_msi_enabled()) > > + if (pci_aer_available()) > > return -ENXIO; > > return pcie_port_service_register(&aerdriver); > > } > > Breaking a big lump into small pieces often makes things clear. > You should return error when AER is _NOT_ available. > > if (!pci_aer_available()) > return -ENXIO; > > Be careful... Yup, sorry. Thanks, Rafael