From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgNdo-0006t1-7m for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:59:13 +0200 Received: by pwi10 with SMTP id 10so1828090pwi.6 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:58:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MRXyKHNGDeoiw4P1eGX8CWPCLFSdEnUWK+Uh5Npji4c=; b=DDi5cbj3mxh3AjJr0GdHUU5KTTpMmQ+FdziHX/ZRTXfhCXAuTWuvZpqY9fp7rr9wly pC+OfJ6BU5muRxJqOaArzRqPRi0a6cgXDflJ+mI1vXFhNMDOwYxGxJI2Xv0TtHd94n5z nyMALXBnvYT+C4IgC99LYObVA8n5eZ72aoZW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=rg+qrZZlPwVcF93K5y96FNX7PE6OWKODBkPqUaods6JvX8I8HvSJ3SIde6wJIgq3Sq 25WhTVho6fh/YBjfWoW3fV9vmAjWwekELvn7CVaT5m3KeYbgO0LKNd30sgR4r8jiDVAa gRpDYp+qgwhsil1DzReUqDinabvrk632/eDm4= Received: by 10.142.1.12 with SMTP id 12mr6994104wfa.233.1280865533868; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm9557601wfa.10.2010.08.03.12.58.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:58:47 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100803195847.GB5264@gmail.com> References: <1280554451-27780-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20100803133515.GD12134@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.160.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:59:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (03/08/10 17:36), Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03-08-10 15:35, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:13:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Acked-by: Koen Kooi > >> > >> If noone objects, can we get this in ASAP? > > > > Building from scratch armv4t then armv6 was ok, building few more > > packages for armv4t again still worked, but now I've upgraded gcc/eglibc > > and building eglibc-initial for armv4t first fails: > > > > http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/665289/ > > http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/config.log > > > > see > > configure: error: compiler support for __thread is require > > and > > Fatal error: Invalid -march= option: `armv4t' > > I had that with a previous incarnation of that patchset, but it seems to > have gone away. > Do we want to solve this problem first or apply the patches and solve it > later? All right the beast is in. Please rebuild from scratch as the location of toolchain has once again changed. Thanks a bunch to everyone who helped in testing these patches and thereby making them worthy Thanks -Khem