From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgZu5-0007gx-6i for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:04:49 +0200 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so2362899fxm.6 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lELfHeCjoaomU2KsyvqeZIMbvWgEpMYGq++OK12bydM=; b=s8fpdLDuhi1bOF83uJZr+ITXPo73+HRw4i8057i6T9PPclC817bZkHvzVuyQbL62zT dFZGJ6UUeG1qEQ0ixGLYUym2hx7vFzQfiI1TP1SoczRPeyvB5Xxl/3ZRTtWLYG7ujFEp 4KvazbGjqVqlMS2xaX9fjZWfd3eyLs37D8VM0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=xkzUkhwrUIR0BDdignEUSeiZ8CdbfmRyv20QBFcEDyICQ23ovsaeBjWo5JGGoN1/Z5 J/cOQ90Pu3N2LL6jXgzIF6OT5nQ28AHM8DV5M2taj6BTrF9zPk3C+1OLPBym6FFOtUGc IohYAOzlhKNvniC7Ehye+cnFzlZkEyYerlxus= Received: by 10.223.122.146 with SMTP id l18mr8481839far.82.1280912684975; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y2sm2877341fau.36.2010.08.04.02.04.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:04:55 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100804090455.GE12134@jama> References: <1280554451-27780-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20100803133515.GD12134@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:04:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 03-08-10 15:35, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:13:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>> Hash: SHA1 > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Koen Kooi > >>> > >>> If noone objects, can we get this in ASAP? > >> > >> Building from scratch armv4t then armv6 was ok, building few more > >> packages for armv4t again still worked, but now I've upgraded gcc/eglibc > >> and building eglibc-initial for armv4t first fails: > >> > >> http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/665289/ > >> http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/config.log > >> > >> see > >> configure: error: compiler support for __thread is require > >> and > >> Fatal error: Invalid -march= option: `armv4t' > > > > I had that with a previous incarnation of that patchset, but it seems to > > have gone away. > > Do we want to solve this problem first or apply the patches and solve it > > later? > I would suggest that I push these changes and meanwhile > I will try to reproduce Martin's problem it will take few hours on my > box. It seems that the binutils got wiped out > when Martin cleaned stuff and then building eglibc resorted to > assembler on build machine > and that bombs later. I think I had last incarnation (at last latest on patchwork - pw-am.sh 2521 2524 2525 2523 2522). Khem was right about binutils issue. I did something like this: MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image MACHINE=htcdream bitbake shr-image git pull (for newer gcc+eglibc) MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - and now it failed to build eglibc-initial MACHINE=htcdream bitbake shr-image - this upgraded gcc/eglibc fine export MACHINE=om-gta02 for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb \ openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb; do bitbake -c clean -b $i; done MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - still failing in eglibc-initial export MACHINE=htcdream for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb \ openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb; do bitbake -c clean -b $i; done MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - still failing in eglibc-initial export MACHINE=om-gta02 for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb openembedded/recipes/binutils/binutils*2.20.1*.bb ; do bitbake -c clean -b $i; done MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - seems to pass now Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com