From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?q?=C5=81ukasz_Ole=C5=9B?= Subject: Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:09:01 +0200 Message-ID: <201008042309.01975.lukaszoles@gmail.com> References: <20100604223929.GA8819@orion.carnet.hr> <20100804194457.GA6914@orion.carnet.hr> <20100804201100.GA16839@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100804201100.GA16839@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wednesday 04 August 2010 22:11:00 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:44:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:57:43AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > So the SWIOTLB is 1 out 3. The next component is: > > >=20 > > > 2). Xen SWIOTLB. This is the xen swiotlb code that utilizes the swiot= lb > > > proper that was just made generic enough to be used in this capacity. > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb-2.6.git > > > xen-swiotlb-0.8.2 > > >=20 > > > 3). and then the Xen PCI front. Which utilizes the Xen-SWIOTLB (and > > > also the Xen PCI), to well, allow guests to have PCI devices passed > > > in. > > >=20 > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git > > > pv/pcifront-2.6.34 > > >=20 > > > The 2) and 3) are mostly Xen specific so they should be much more > > > palpable than the first one. > >=20 > > JFTR these now look to be: > >=20 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/2/289 [ SWIOTLB GIT PULL ] > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/27/246 [ Xen-SWIOTLB] > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/4/374 [ RFC Xen PCI patches] > >=20 > > But in the latter you wrote that you don't expect #2 to get in the 2.6.= 36 > > merge window. Why? I saw a single tentative complaint from hpa on one >=20 > No. The #2 is right now brewing in linux-next and I am thinking to ask > Linus to pull it next week. Linus merged it today=20 http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dcomm= it;h=3D4a35cee066df1b1958e25e71595b3845d06b192e =20 :) =2D- =C5=81ukasz Ole=C5=9B