Re: [PATCH 2.6.37? ] drivers/input: Use pr_<level>

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On Wednesday, August 04, 2010 01:44:32 am Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 01:04 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:33:42AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 21:32 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > 
> > > These files?
> > > $ grep -rPl --include=*.[ch] "\bstruct\s+device\b" drivers/input | \
> > >
> > >   xargs grep -wl pr_fmt
> > >
> > > drivers/input/keyboard/omap-keypad.c
> > > drivers/input/mousedev.c
> > > drivers/input/serio/serio.c
> > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c
> > > drivers/input/evdev.c
> > > drivers/input/joydev.c
> > > drivers/input/gameport/gameport.c
> > > drivers/input/touchscreen/htcpen.c
> > > drivers/input/input-polldev.c
> > > drivers/input/input.c
> > > drivers/input/tablet/aiptek.c
> > > drivers/input/misc/winbond-cir.c
> > > drivers/input/misc/yealink.c
> > > drivers/input/misc/ati_remote2.c
> > > drivers/input/misc/wistron_btns.c
> > > drivers/input/misc/ati_remote.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
> > 
> > There should be more. USB for example. Basically anything but very old
> > legacy drivers that never been converted to the 2.6 device model.
> 
> I propose you take the patch as-is and then conversions
> from pr_<level>(...) to dev_<level>(struct device *, ...)
> can be done as appropriate.
> 
> > > $ grep -l "define pr_fmt" drivers/input/mouse/*.[ch] | \
> > >
> > >   xargs grep -il "ps2" 
> > >
> > > drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/lifebook.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/logips2pp.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
> > 
> > psmouse-base should use KBUILD_MODNAME, for the rest of these
> > KBUILD_BASENAME seems to fit.
> > 
> > > drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c
> > > drivers/input/mouse/trackpoint.c
> > > 
> > > Which ones do you want converted? 
> > > Any others?
> > >
> > >No, I think this is it as far as PS/2 mice go.
> 
> OK, done.
> 
> Do you want a diff from the original,
> a new single patch or patches by directory?

Split by directories, if possible, please.

-- 
Dmitry