From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 16517] New: rp_filter fails to filter with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH and more than one 0/0 nexthop dev
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:46:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100805134653.9e8985cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-16517-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:48:01 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16517
>
> Summary: rp_filter fails to filter with
> CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH and more than one 0/0
> nexthop dev
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: at least 2.6.18 and newer
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: high
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@gmail.com
> Regression: No
>
>
> I think the problem is net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c fib_validate_source()
>
> ...
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH
> if (FIB_RES_DEV(res) == dev || res.fi->fib_nhs > 1)
> #else
> if (FIB_RES_DEV(res) == dev)
> #endif
> ...
>
> I'm not sure, but this code is quite trivial and self-speaking. In case we have
> several default routes, we'd better iterate over each of them and compare
> resulting devices with the input one. So, fix is also trivial, specially for
> network kernel developers. ;-)
>
> I've set priority "High" cause it doesn't affects usual Linux users directly,
> but indirectly it can affect any host on Internet, so the problem is
> significant, of course.
>
> P. S. Kernel docs say: {
> rp_filter - INTEGER
> 0 - No source validation.
> 1 - Strict mode as defined in RFC3704 Strict Reverse Path
> Each incoming packet is tested against the FIB and if the interface
> is not the best reverse path the packet check will fail.
> By default failed packets are discarded.
> 2 - Loose mode as defined in RFC3704 Loose Reverse Path
> Each incoming packet's source address is also tested against the
> FIB
> and if the source address is not reachable via any interface
> the packet check will fail.
>
> Current recommended practice in RFC3704 is to enable strict mode
> to prevent IP spoofing from DDos attacks. If using asymmetric routing
> or other complicated routing, then loose mode is recommended.
>
> conf/all/rp_filter must also be set to non-zero to do source validation
> on the interface
>
> Default value is 0. Note that some distributions enable it
> in startup scripts.
> }, but is in reality level "2" of rp_filtering implemented?
>
> P. P. S. netfilter would be the best place to have Reverse Path checks. But
> that's another story.
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-16517-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-08-05 20:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-09-07 5:35 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 16517] New: rp_filter fails to filter with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH and more than one 0/0 nexthop dev David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100805134653.9e8985cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.