From: Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@lvk.cs.msu.su>
To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>,
linuxpps@ml.enneenne.com, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 05/16] pps: access pps device by direct pointer
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:42:31 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100805154231.52555130@desktopvm.lvknet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100805093236.GI26615@gundam.enneenne.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2019 bytes --]
В Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:32:36 +0200
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> пишет:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:06:42AM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Using device index as a pointer needs some unnecessary work to be done
> > every time the pointer is needed (in irq handler for example).
> > Using a direct pointer is much more easy (and safe as well).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@lvk.cs.msu.su>
[snip]
>
> If you remove these functions you can't be sure anymore that nobodies
> may call pps_event() over a non existent device...
[snip]
> By dropping pps_get_source you may be here by a call from (i.e.) a
> serial port driver whose doesn't know if your PPS source is gone or
> not...
>
> I don't understand how your modifications may resolve this problem.
Well, this can happen only if PPS client module calls pps_event before
calling pps_register_source() or after pps_unregister_source(). This
means that it's broken! If we try to handle/workaround broken clients it
affects performance. So we have to choose what is the priority:
security or performance. My guru told me I shouldn't bother too much
about broken kernel-space code which my code interacts with. If it's
broken it should be fixed. Some assertions enabled by DEBUG define are
enough. For me it makes sense but I don't know what should I check here?
Well I can add something like that to pps_event:
BUG_ON((pps == NULL) || (pps_get_source(pps->id) != pps));
where pps_get_source is:
static inline struct pps_device *pps_get_source(int source)
{
struct pps_device *pps;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&pps_idr_lock, flags);
pps = idr_find(&pps_idr, source);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps_idr_lock, flags);
return pps;
}
BTW, while looking at the code to answer your question I've found a
bug: struct pps_device was not kfree'd on device destruction. The fix
will appear soon. Perhaps with an assertion above if you like it.
--
Alexander
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 21:06 [PATCHv3 00/16] pps: several fixes and improvements Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 01/16] pps: trivial fixes Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 8:57 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 02/16] pps: declare variables where they are used in switch Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 9:05 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 03/16] pps: fix race in PPS_FETCH handler Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 5:19 ` Vitezslav Samel
2010-08-05 10:19 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 11:07 ` Vitezslav Samel
2010-08-05 14:31 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 9:15 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 04/16] pps: unify timestamp gathering Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 9:17 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 05/16] pps: access pps device by direct pointer Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-05 9:32 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-05 11:42 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2010-08-05 12:31 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-09 7:53 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-09 12:47 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 06/16] pps: convert printk/pr_* to dev_* Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 07/16] pps: move idr stuff to pps.c Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 08/16] pps: add async PPS event handler Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 09/16] pps: don't disable interrupts when using spin locks Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 10/16] pps: use BUG_ON for kernel API safety checks Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 11/16] pps: simplify conditions a bit Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 12/16] ntp: add hardpps implementation Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 22:49 ` john stultz
2010-08-05 12:00 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-04 23:39 ` David Daney
2010-08-04 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 13/16] pps: capture MONOTONIC_RAW timestamps as well Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 23:03 ` john stultz
2010-08-05 12:16 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-05 12:29 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 14/16] pps: add kernel consumer support Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 15/16] pps: add parallel port PPS client Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-05 12:48 ` Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 21:06 ` [PATCHv3 16/16] pps: add parallel port PPS signal generator Alexander Gordeev
2010-08-04 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100805154231.52555130@desktopvm.lvknet \
--to=lasaine@lvk.cs.msu.su \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxpps@ml.enneenne.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yoush@cs.msu.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.