From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ??
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:20:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008062020.29921.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C5CA269.8010401@emk-elektronik.de>
On Friday, August 06, 2010 20:01:45 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> If, after considering my comments above, you still think you really need
> >> a custodian for AT91, I am game for it.
> >
> > go for it
>
> considering that both AVR32 and AT91 share most of the peripheral hardware
> building blocks, and therefore share the drivers, it seems to make sense to
> have an atmel custodian tree instead of avr32 and at91. Each change to a
> shared
> driver must (at least with MAKEALL) be checked for both architectures and
> adding it to both trees would make life unnecessary complicated...
yes, but the cores are going to be radically different. so i imagine you'd be
fine with the peripheral drivers, but not the avr32 core. it's your time
though of course.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20100806/1cb5b623/attachment.pgp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-07 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 2:02 [U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ?? Reinhard Meyer
2010-07-29 4:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-03 21:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-05 9:14 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-05 10:13 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-08-05 10:44 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-05 12:03 ` Eric Bénard
2010-08-05 16:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-05 18:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 0:01 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-07 0:20 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2010-08-07 0:58 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-07 3:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-07 21:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 21:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 21:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 23:19 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-07 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-08 0:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-05 13:21 ` Bas Mevissen
2010-08-07 22:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-09 1:27 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-09 5:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-09 6:29 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-09 6:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-09 8:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-09 11:13 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-09 15:48 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008062020.29921.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.