All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@lhnet.ca>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@ixiacom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allow netdev_wait_allrefs() to run faster
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:03:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100809210311.GW30010@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1tyn3v9pp.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:59:14PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The network device deletion batching code has gone in, which is
> a big help, as have some dev_put deletions, so we hit that 250ms
> delay less often.  

I'll see how much that helps.  Odds are I'm going to have to move the 
device deletion into a separate thread.  That should give me a natural 
boundary to queue up deletions at, which should fix the tunnel-flap and 
partial tunnel-flap cases I'm worried about.  At some point I have to 
figure out how to get my API needs met by the in-kernel L2TP code, but 
that's a worry for another day.

> sysfs feature wise has now settled down, and the regressions have all
> been stamped out so now should be a good time to work on scaling.
> 
> I still have some preliminary patches in my tree, that I will dig up
> as time goes by.

I should have some time this evening to run a few tests, and hopefully can 
post some results.

		-ben

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-09 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-17 22:18 [PATCH/RFC] make unregister_netdev() delete more than 4 interfaces per second Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18  4:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-18 16:13   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 17:51     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-18 18:21       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 19:36         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 12:39         ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-21 15:40           ` [PATCH] net: allow netdev_wait_allrefs() to run faster Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 16:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 16:51             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-21 19:54               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 23:07               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-29 23:38                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-30  1:45                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 14:35                     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-30 14:43                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-30 23:25                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 23:53                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-31  0:37                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-09 17:23                   ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 17:34                     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 17:44                       ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 17:48                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 18:03                           ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 19:59                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-09 21:03                         ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2010-08-09 21:17                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-21 16:55             ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-23 21:13             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24  4:35               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24  5:49                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24  8:49                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 13:52                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 14:24                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 14:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 23:49                         ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25  4:47                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-25  8:35                           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-25 15:19                             ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25 19:28                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 20:22                 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100809210311.GW30010@kvack.org \
    --to=bcrl@lhnet.ca \
    --cc=cratiu@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.