From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: dspbridge and the omapl1x Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:02:50 +0300 Message-ID: <20100812060250.GC23362@nokia.com> References: Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:42607 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752724Ab0HLGCe (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:02:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "ext Kamoolkar, Mugdha" Cc: Hari Kanigeri , Ben Gardiner , "Ramos Falcon, Ernesto" , "Uribe de Leon, Armando" , "Menon, Nishanth" , KulikovVasiliy , "Sapiens, Rene" , AndyShevchenko , FelipeContreras , "Ramirez Luna, Omar" , OhadBen-Cohen , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Uppal, Deepali" Hi, On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:00:05AM +0200, ext Kamoolkar, Mugdha wrote: >One thing I would like to mention is that the DMM feature does require >the slave DSP to have an MMU. The OMAPL1xx devices do not have MMU for >the DSP. DMM cannot be implemented without the DSP having an MMU. >Hence, even if you ported DSPBridge to OMAPL1xx devices, you could not >make use of the DMM feature. > >However, you are correct that dynamic linking and loading is a feature >that is available in DSPBridge, and which is missing in DSPLink, which >could work on OMAPL1xx if you ported DSPBridge to OMAPL1xx please follow the Netiquette [1]. It's really difficult to follow dspbridge threads. [1] http://www.elinux.org/Netiquette -- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org