From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: dspbridge and the omapl1x Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:23:43 +0300 Message-ID: <20100812062343.GD23362@nokia.com> References: Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]:22903 "EHLO mgw-sa02.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758066Ab0HLGXQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:23:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "ext Kamoolkar, Mugdha" Cc: Hari Kanigeri , Ben Gardiner , "Ramos Falcon, Ernesto" , "Uribe de Leon, Armando" , "Menon, Nishanth" , KulikovVasiliy , "Sapiens, Rene" , AndyShevchenko , FelipeContreras , "Ramirez Luna, Omar" , OhadBen-Cohen , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Uppal, Deepali" Hi, On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:16:23AM +0200, ext Kamoolkar, Mugdha wrote: >One thing I would like to mention is that the DMM feature does require >the slave DSP to have an MMU. The OMAPL1xx devices do not have MMU for >the DSP. DMM cannot be implemented without the DSP having an MMU. >Hence, even if you ported DSPBridge to OMAPL1xx devices, you could not >make use of the DMM feature. your lines are still too wide. Tell your mailer to break them on 80 characters. -- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org