From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Cc: David Beaumont <djb31st@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008121150.33820.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim8cNH29kS=VM+m18OeexHaxwo19ug6Yu04Q6wx@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 811 bytes --]
David Beaumont wrote:
> The bat0 interface is currently bridged as follows
>
> On the router with internet going into the WAN port (ETH1), BAT0 is
> bridged with the LAN (ETH0) Internet works correctly though the lan,
> so i would assume NAT routing to the WAN is setup correctly?
so you have eth0 and bat0(ath0) in a bridge br0 -> eth1 uses nat to translate
packets for/from eth1?
> On the router on the other end of the mesh, BAT0 is bridged with the
> WAN port (ETH1) so that the router will route WAN traffic though BAT0?
What? Why a different internet gateway and why do you bridge the bat0(ath0)
interface with the wan interface instead of using nat here?
Maybe there is a misunderstanding somewhere... At least I am extremely
confused about your setup.
Best regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.375.1281525844.17951.b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
[not found] ` <AANLkTim-RfupM1iHH-dFwtDiN5RLFVaP=AWK9=MH-dGK@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-11 11:48 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question David Beaumont
[not found] ` <AANLkTinhcpamuMGApH9D5SPn3VNkEi9BDCYwGkRcDdJq@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-11 12:50 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 9:31 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 9:38 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 9:50 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2010-08-12 10:11 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:16 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:33 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 10:41 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:50 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 11:08 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 11:29 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-12 11:41 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:14 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:19 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 13:26 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:27 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-13 5:45 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-14 14:46 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-16 13:11 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-16 16:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-17 8:14 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:53 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:57 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:58 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 11:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-23 7:05 ` David Beaumont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008121150.33820.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=djb31st@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.