From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol61Z-0001LZ-QO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:11:15 +0200 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so3261417fxm.6 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Uhog3bPAgHTa5NRds+bd02rWj5w1hdBx0yshqdWzYtY=; b=U0zkzTmtpXTFdF6K+2Hg6YCmZYYX272Qf6kdKHzkFkamF5dH2c1LTWry0IcsUjWTtJ dMsQ52lYg5RGQ/xlKPjfrki8PXsOpDxB2mQluaFIWum6GcKQ/kNWGQQTTm9r+ZgjxXU+ EriOhjnwybOt39hipaAv4SwSNkyVMzgNncmrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=idNTjeMs5AjriiHa4BHGqpC7X6RBgTNPtbS01+QqcFre31HMOUh5Lw03ejWwPeMmUW kTt1MfpauLlSptwWodlbtqWUDCuYIFqQUvtQ65+lQDFpItqbPY1bSshZGv0LivcOWbh5 FCCsov7AEyijYyzCU38bzZ+rjl/HU+CRBtTtk= Received: by 10.223.114.69 with SMTP id d5mr5612723faq.43.1281989456555; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20sm2635860faa.4.2010.08.16.13.10.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:11:08 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100816201108.GI10076@jama> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: rename files dirs X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:11:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Currently lots of our patches reside in a directory called files. > Somewhere in the past koen explained me that that is not really proper > (and I agree with them). > files should only be used in case a dir has multiple recipes (say X.bb > and Y.bb) which both use the same patch > If there is only a single recipe with multiple versions (e.g.X_0.bb > and X_1.bb) then common patches should go into a dir X. > And if the patches are for a specific version they should go in X-0, X-1 etc. > > When I'm bored again on a rainy sunday afternoon or so, I can spent > some time on moving things. > Are people comfortable with that? > Also what would be the preferred way to store the patches for a recipe > with only one version (Z_3.bb) > Should this preferably be in Z or in Z-3 ? If it's something where you expect the need to update the patch for Z_4 then I would say Z-3, but if it's some tweak (ie to allow crossbuilding) and the same patch applied to Z_[12345] then Z is right dir (if Z_6 needs updated patch it will be named the same but in Z-6). > > Your opinion is apprecated I did exactly the same while cleaning xorg-* dirs. So I agree. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com