From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OlGFL-0000IN-C9 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:06:09 +0200 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so3466418fxm.6 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:05:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=e3XXBWm9dfFcBYHP6CoBuepoNcbP7EBYvnY+ep0huB0=; b=C+cgXB5V4wPuvBhcedZFxnmtmr5O25rnK9t3Hee50NYbiObGMI9dEE2RJiCSQqX1tq akFux15lbY0jsJbfVYsTknLBetO7Ia5Ti9lcMTCq7bqSpmTFnVzGKx0c42IToBfSAEE/ Ne3z+nEHZ2rBwJysAsbV+BHPLbhB323c3Pa7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=t+jkAs1fa16Qn3sQYsoGesatuD7/CMVpEzQ/EpCniYvL/sNQeQ01eLm7Ht8AT5ONod 2QETdFwxatGsecpPSBBwkzJ/xo2konh3jv0mzOULb20fKeUH48waPFgCe8n24sG2Ybba llbSeamEMxl5NW7jScLYHJuEGYbquq9LR655I= Received: by 10.223.108.71 with SMTP id e7mr6081189fap.13.1282028734342; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f28sm1512867faa.24.2010.08.17.00.05.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:05:48 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100817070548.GD11569@jama> References: <1281983778-21054-1-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> <201008162325.59305.roman@khimov.ru> <201008171050.16611.roman@khimov.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201008171050.16611.roman@khimov.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] openssl: update 1.0.0 to 1.0.0a X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 07:06:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:50:13AM +0400, Roman I Khimov wrote: > В сообщении от Понедельник 16 августа 2010 23:35:59 автор Khem Raj написал: > > IMO the newest version in a recipe should always be default preference > > this way we can > > stabilize recipe upgrades quicker. This also means a wider testing > > before pushing a new recipe > > DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" makes it to escape the testing. > > Well, consider Perl, for example. Making 5.10.1 a default preference would > break binary packaged perl modules built for 5.8.8, so technically some > massive PR bump (most probably DISTRO_PR) is needed when updating to 5.10.1. > Forcing distro maintainers to do that is not nice, IMO. But if you drop D_P globally you can bump PR of depending packages just once. If distro maintainders add P_V_perl = "5.10.1" one by one, then we'll have multiple PR bumps. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com