From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 02/10] fs: dentry allocation consolidation
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:37:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100817184120.374122837@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100817183729.613117146@kernel.dk
[-- Attachment #1: fs-dentry-alloc-consolidate.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3051 bytes --]
fs: dentry allocation consolidation
There are 2 duplicate copies of code in dentry allocation in path lookup.
Consolidate them into a single function.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---
fs/namei.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/namei.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/namei.c 2010-08-18 04:04:29.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/fs/namei.c 2010-08-18 04:05:12.000000000 +1000
@@ -686,6 +686,35 @@ static __always_inline void follow_dotdo
}
/*
+ * Allocate a dentry with name and parent, and perform a parent
+ * directory ->lookup on it. Returns the new dentry, or ERR_PTR
+ * on error. parent->d_inode->i_mutex must be held. d_lookup must
+ * have verified that no child exists while under i_mutex.
+ */
+static struct dentry *d_alloc_and_lookup(struct dentry *parent,
+ struct qstr *name, struct nameidata *nd)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = parent->d_inode;
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+ struct dentry *old;
+
+ /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
+ if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(inode)))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+ dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
+ if (unlikely(!dentry))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ old = inode->i_op->lookup(inode, dentry, nd);
+ if (unlikely(old)) {
+ dput(dentry);
+ dentry = old;
+ }
+ return dentry;
+}
+
+/*
* It's more convoluted than I'd like it to be, but... it's still fairly
* small and for now I'd prefer to have fast path as straight as possible.
* It _is_ time-critical.
@@ -738,30 +767,13 @@ need_lookup:
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
*/
dentry = d_lookup(parent, name);
- if (!dentry) {
- struct dentry *new;
-
- /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
- dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
- goto out_unlock;
-
- new = d_alloc(parent, name);
- dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- if (new) {
- dentry = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, new, nd);
- if (dentry)
- dput(new);
- else
- dentry = new;
- }
-out_unlock:
+ if (likely(!dentry)) {
+ dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(parent, name, nd);
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
if (IS_ERR(dentry))
goto fail;
goto done;
}
-
/*
* Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
* we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
@@ -1135,24 +1147,8 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(stru
if (dentry && dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
- if (!dentry) {
- struct dentry *new;
-
- /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
- dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- if (IS_DEADDIR(inode))
- goto out;
-
- new = d_alloc(base, name);
- dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- if (!new)
- goto out;
- dentry = inode->i_op->lookup(inode, new, nd);
- if (!dentry)
- dentry = new;
- else
- dput(new);
- }
+ if (!dentry)
+ dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(base, name, nd);
out:
return dentry;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 18:37 [patch 00/10] first set of vfs scale patches Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 01/10] fs: fix do_lookup false negative Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 22:45 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-17 23:04 ` Sage Weil
2010-08-18 13:41 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-17 18:37 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-08-17 22:45 ` [patch 02/10] fs: dentry allocation consolidation Valerie Aurora
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 03/10] apparmor: use task path helpers Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 22:59 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 04/10] fs: fs_struct rwlock to spinlock Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 23:14 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-20 10:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 05/10] fs: remove extra lookup in __lookup_hash Nick Piggin
2010-08-18 13:57 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 21:13 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 19:34 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 06/10] fs: cleanup files_lock locking Nick Piggin
2010-08-18 19:46 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 07/10] tty: fix fu_list abuse Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 08/10] lglock: introduce special lglock and brlock spin locks Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 09/10] fs: scale files_lock Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 18:37 ` [patch 10/10] fs: brlock vfsmount_lock Nick Piggin
2010-08-18 14:05 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-20 10:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-08-17 21:14 ` [patch 00/10] first set of vfs scale patches Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100817184120.374122837@kernel.dk \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.