From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] first set of vfs scale patches
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:14:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20100817211418.GL31363@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20100817183729.613117146@kernel.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:55390 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751120Ab0HQVOU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:14:20 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100817183729.613117146@kernel.dk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:37:29AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Does not contain inode lock patches yet, I've not
> quite finished porting them yet, but even when I do I think they should
> get some time in linux-next and some more time for people to review them
> before going upstream. So let's wait for next release on those?
> 
> This patchset contains:
> * some misc bits
> * rwlock->spinlock for fs_struct lock
> * files_lock cleanup
> * tty files list bugfix
> * files_lock scaling
> * vfsmount_lock scaling
> 
> These should all be in good shape for review and hopefully merging, so
> please let me know if I need to fix anything.

OK, I'll review that stuff and hopefully push to Linus tonight