From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:24:18 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Message-Id: <20100818112418.a25a50d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <20100801132226.GE3711@salidar.me.mortis.eu> <1280669402-31213-1-git-send-email-me@mortis.eu> <4C5950B6.5010503@redhat.com> <20100810191117.GN14382@salidar.me.mortis.eu> <4C651800.6030804@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C651800.6030804@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans de Goede Cc: Giel van Schijndel , Laurens Leemans , Jonathan Cameron , Randy Dunlap , Jean Delvare , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:36 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/10/2010 09:11 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On 08/01/2010 03:30 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > >>> Allow device probing to recognise the Fintek F71808E. > >>> > >>> Sysfs interface: > >>> * Fan/pwm control is the same as for F71889FG > >> > >> My datasheet strongly disagrees with this ... > > > > I just noticed this patch was applied to mainline anyway. Regardless, I > > will (try to) address these issues you raised. > > > > Right now however, I am prioritising personal stuff above this > > driver---bachelor's thesis and graduation presentation. When finished > > with that (september) I'll allocate time to these issues again. > > > > I've send a mail directly to akpm asking for this to be removed, hopefully > this will help. It seems that I managed to muck up my paperwork and the patch was merged into mainline. We can revert it, or we can fix it up in place in time for 2.6.36. What do you guys suggest? _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753277Ab0HRSZ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:25:58 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35123 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753226Ab0HRSZ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:25:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:24:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hans de Goede Cc: Giel van Schijndel , Laurens Leemans , Jonathan Cameron , Randy Dunlap , Jean Delvare , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Fintek F71808E Message-Id: <20100818112418.a25a50d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4C651800.6030804@redhat.com> References: <20100801132226.GE3711@salidar.me.mortis.eu> <1280669402-31213-1-git-send-email-me@mortis.eu> <4C5950B6.5010503@redhat.com> <20100810191117.GN14382@salidar.me.mortis.eu> <4C651800.6030804@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:36 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/10/2010 09:11 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On 08/01/2010 03:30 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > >>> Allow device probing to recognise the Fintek F71808E. > >>> > >>> Sysfs interface: > >>> * Fan/pwm control is the same as for F71889FG > >> > >> My datasheet strongly disagrees with this ... > > > > I just noticed this patch was applied to mainline anyway. Regardless, I > > will (try to) address these issues you raised. > > > > Right now however, I am prioritising personal stuff above this > > driver---bachelor's thesis and graduation presentation. When finished > > with that (september) I'll allocate time to these issues again. > > > > I've send a mail directly to akpm asking for this to be removed, hopefully > this will help. It seems that I managed to muck up my paperwork and the patch was merged into mainline. We can revert it, or we can fix it up in place in time for 2.6.36. What do you guys suggest?