From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:27:59 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Config file for Gigabyte MA785GM-US2H Message-Id: <20100819182759.51f20d5f@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <1281670026.2676.3.camel@honcho> In-Reply-To: <1281670026.2676.3.camel@honcho> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Glen, On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:27:06 -0700, Glen wrote: > Here's a config file I worked up for the Gigabyte MA758GM-US2H. It's > based off of one taken from your web site. This is NOT confirmed by > examination of the MB, just by observed readings. Out of curiosity, which configuration file did you start from? > # lm_sensors configuration file for the Gigabyte MA785GM-US2H motherboard > # 8-12-2010 G. Journeay Please follow ISO-8601 for dates, otherwise it's ambiguous. I read the above as December 8th, withe you certainly meant August 12th. > ### Voltages > > label in0 "Vcore" > label in1 "Vram" # "DDR2" in BIOS > label in2 "+3.3V" > label in3 "+5V" # Not in BIOS > ignore in4 > ignore in5 > ignore in6 > label in7 "+12V" > label in8 "Vbat" # Not in BIOS > > # Vcore, Vram, +3.3V and Vbat are connected directly, so no compute > # line is needed for these. For +5V the chip is configured to use > # internal scaling. For +12V the default resistors seem to have been > # used. > compute in0 @ * ( 3/10+1), @ / ( 3/10+1) This is inconsistent. You just said that Vcore didn't need any scaling, yet you have a compute statement for Vcore. In all honestly, I would be very surprised if it were correct... Vcore is never scaled, it doesn't need to (it's way below the +4.08V limit.) How did you come up with it? > compute in3 @ * (6.8/10+1), @ / (6.8/10+1) > compute in7 @ * ( 45/10+1), @ / ( 45/10+1) > ### Temperatures > > label temp1 "CPU Temp" > label temp3 "NBr Temp" > label temp2 "MB Temp" Would be more intuitive to leave them in order. > set temp1_min 0 > set temp1_max 60 > set temp2_min 0 > set temp3_max 50 > set temp3_min 0 > set temp3_max 50 You're setting temp3_max twice, and you're never setting temp2_max. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors