From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmF4Y-0001yq-EC for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:03:08 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.251.53.61]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L7F00IR9C42HVH4@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:02:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 552FC14AF64; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:02:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:02:26 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko In-reply-to: To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20100820000226.GD26112@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 References: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.46.173.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: denis@denix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: OE stable, testing, dev (was Re: What to do about the poor bitbake Quality Control?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:03:08 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:05:48PM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/8/18 Jason Kridner : > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Cliff Brake wrote: >=20 > >> > >> Getting started > >> (http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Getting_started) points = to a > >> tarball for bitbake 1.8.18. =A0Is this still the recommended > >> version/mechanism for new users? =A0I much prefer simply pulling= bitbake > >> from git. > > > > Koen pointed me to > > http://gitorious.org/angstrom/angstrom-setup-scripts/blobs/master= /oebb.sh > > for setting up my environment. =A0I also prefer pulling bitbake f= rom > > git. =A0Koen seems to be pulling bitbake 1.10, instead of 1.8.18. > > > 1.10 is now officially released and is supposed to be better and fa= ster. > I think we should change the wiki page to reflect using 1.10 1.10 is Python 2.6 based (AFAIK) and some people are not up to speed = with=20 that, i.e. using older distros with 2.5 or even 2.4... --=20 Denys