From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:31:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] lpc32xx/clock: Use && instead of & In-Reply-To: <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F80ACF95B12A@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> References: <1281451732-19294-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F80ACF95B12A@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> Message-ID: <20100820063111.GA7313@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:50:17AM +0200, Kevin Wells wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH] lpc32xx/clock: Use && instead of & > > > > Because we are connecting two expressions here, not binary values. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > Cc: Kevin Wells > > Acked-by: Kevin Wells > > Do you want me to pull this patch into my next series? Yes, I think this would be easiest. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: