All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:43:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100820134314.GA3283@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinA3-KMPKJa-66QCMUpbDFwey2mjE=VN=9=zg=6@mail.gmail.com>

[ executive summary: trying to explain why static variable declarations
  within the body of functions is bad in kernel code. ]

* Changli Gao (xiaosuo@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I see. But I think the static variable should stay declared outside
> > of the function scope, with a nice comment explaining why it's not
> > initialized at init-time.
> >
> > Hiding global state in function code is usually frowned upon.
> >
> 
> I don't agree with you. We'd better not expose the variable which
> isn't expected to be used by others. If not, maybe someone will misuse
> it.

We are talking about a static variable usable only within a single file,
where is the problem ? A nice comment can have this effect.

> The user should only reply on the interface, but not the internal
> implementation.

I'm talking about good practice to help code review. This is way more
important than the potential "encapsulation" benefit of hiding global
state (a static variable) within the body of a function.

I remember that Andrew Morton has strong opinions about this, and I
remember being in complete agreement with him on the topic.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

      reply	other threads:[~2010-08-20 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-19 14:33 [PATCH v2] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use Changli Gao
2010-08-19 15:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-19 15:35   ` Changli Gao
2010-08-19 15:41     ` yao zhao
2010-08-19 15:46     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-19 16:11       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-19 23:10         ` Changli Gao
2010-08-20 13:43           ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100820134314.GA3283@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.