Re: Patch fixing vlan handling when network-bridge scriptis used

[Michael Brade <brade@kde.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1099 bytes --]

On Friday 20 August 2010 01:11:18 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>  On 08/19/2010 08:59 AM, Michael Brade wrote:
> > But I had to add the "ethtool -K $vif tx off" to vif-bridge to fix the
> > checksums error. Maybe this could be added by default with a check for
> > ethtool?
> 
> This was a problem in pvops dom0 kernels a long time ago, but it has
> been fixed for... maybe a year?  If you're still having problems without
> the ethtool, please report them.

I did in my last mail and now I also added it to Bugzilla. Do you have enough 
information in that entry or do I need to add other things as well?

Btw, it did work with HVM where the guest communicates over the tap1.0 
interface, it just doesn't work with PV-guests on the vif1.0 interface. What 
is the difference between the two, why does HVM use one and PV the other?

cheers,
-- 
Michael Brade;                                              KDE Developer
  |-mail: echo brade !#|tr -d "c oh"|s\e\d 's/e/\@/2;s/$/.org/;s/bra/k/2'
  °--web: http://www.behindkde.org/people/michaelb/

KDE 4: Beyond Your Expectations

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel