All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35 performance results
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:33:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823193325.GJ26773@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C72C871.4040602@austin.ibm.com>

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:13:53PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> This did not seem to help, in fact we regressed more with COW
> enabled.. One thing to note, the last 2 sets of runs in the history
> graphs were actually run by Keith and he used stock kernel trees.
> For my recreate, I pulled the latest btrfs-unstable which is based
> on a 2.6.34 tree. Should I retest this on stock 2.6.35?  The high
> time in btrfs_start_one_delalloc_inode still exists.

btrfs-unstable or .35 are both fine.

Is this a fresh mkfs or are you reusing an existing tree?

> 
> Full results can be found here:
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/perftest/perfpatch/perfpatch.html
> 
> 128 thread random write test that shows the problem:
> 
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/perftest/perfpatch/perfpatch_Large_file_random_writes._num_threads=128.html

Ok, thanks, I'll try again.

-chris


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-06 18:44 2.6.35 performance results Steven Pratt
2010-08-06 18:58 ` Chris Mason
2010-08-16 20:04 ` Chris Mason
2010-08-16 21:51   ` Steven Pratt
2010-08-19  1:00     ` Chris Mason
2010-08-21 15:25       ` Steven Pratt
2010-08-23 19:13         ` Steven Pratt
2010-08-23 19:33           ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-08-23 20:10             ` Steven Pratt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-08  4:18 A. James Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100823193325.GJ26773@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.