From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2263CB70B4 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:58:14 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:58:05 +0200 References: <201008231552.07013.arnd@arndb.de> <1282631584.22370.523.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1282631584.22370.523.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201008240958.06094.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andreas Schwab , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 20 August 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > See arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c. > > > > > > * 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being > > > * linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall > > > * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary > > > * opd symbols: > > > > Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment. > > If only I could remember who that was. > > Regardless of the outcome of that, I'm merging Andreas patch. We can > always add SPU bindings if we feel like it later. Sorry, I should have added a ';-)' or been clearer. The patch is good, I wrote the comment that Andreas quoted and it's probably my own fault that we never found a way to handle syscalls like this correctly from the SPU. Arnd