From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasily Khoruzhick Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] h1940: implement mmc_power function Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:19:37 +0300 Message-ID: <201008241819.43833.anarsoul@gmail.com> References: <1282230003-2020-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com> <201008241756.11529.anarsoul@gmail.com> <201008241707.31629.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1305922.Nv0rAGY5II"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:33756 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751507Ab0HXPTw (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:19:52 -0400 Received: by eyg5 with SMTP id 5so3422055eyg.19 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:19:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201008241707.31629.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ben Dooks , "Arnaud Patard (Rtp)" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1305922.Nv0rAGY5II Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BE=D1=82 = 24 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3=D1=83=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B0 2010 18:07:31 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D1= =82=D0=BE=D1=80 Marek Vasut =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > See my previous response. It'd increase code size, but if you mark that > code __init, it'll be freed after that function finishes so it doesn't > matter. >=20 > If something wrong goes on, you can still debug it without for example MMC > card (though if you continued probing the MMC driver, it might cause > additional unwanted noise and make the debugging harder). That's the whole > point. Ok, but I also want to hear Ben's opinion on this point. Regards Vasily --nextPart1305922.Nv0rAGY5II Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkxz4w8ACgkQRM6pQpltKE7pkgCcCHrX5tpw1asAzv+DNx+gsBfk GFgAoNHUgMpemw8QzHUuK239BkO5cdq1 =LArs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1305922.Nv0rAGY5II-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:19:37 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] h1940: implement mmc_power function In-Reply-To: <201008241707.31629.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <1282230003-2020-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com> <201008241756.11529.anarsoul@gmail.com> <201008241707.31629.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201008241819.43833.anarsoul@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? ????????? ?? 24 ??????? 2010 18:07:31 ????? Marek Vasut ???????: > See my previous response. It'd increase code size, but if you mark that > code __init, it'll be freed after that function finishes so it doesn't > matter. > > If something wrong goes on, you can still debug it without for example MMC > card (though if you continued probing the MMC driver, it might cause > additional unwanted noise and make the debugging harder). That's the whole > point. Ok, but I also want to hear Ben's opinion on this point. Regards Vasily -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: