From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmio_mmc: Revise a limit of the data size Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:24:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20100826072446.GA19339@console-pimps.org> References: <4C33DFF0.3040804@renesas.com> <20100708144647.1e77364b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4C3BD041.3020705@renesas.com> <20100825225208.02a906f7@linux-g6p1.site> <20100825150502.33649ff0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from arkanian.console-pimps.org ([212.110.184.194]:43873 "EHLO arkanian.console-pimps.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752825Ab0HZHYs (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:24:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ian Molton Cc: Andrew Morton , Yusuke Goda , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Paul Mundt On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:50:09AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > Probably dropped because I complained about two things, > > 1) The patch doesnt check what the hardware is underneath before > arbitrarily changing the parameters relied on by some hardware Has anyone thought about adding a caps or flags field to the tmio_mmc_host structure so that platform code set a bit if it can't do 2-byte data block transfers?