From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] =?utf-8?Q?=5BXen-devel?= =?utf-8?Q?=5D_xen-linux-system-2=2E6=2E32-5-xen-amd64=3A_Lenovo_R61=2C_ke?= =?utf-8?Q?rnel_boots_on_baremetel=2C_no_boot_with_xen4_hypervisor?= =?utf-8?B?4oCP?= Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:44:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20100830144414.GC5652@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1283162286.6575.10.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <1283175591.6575.73.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Mike Viau Cc: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, ijc@hellion.org.uk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:16:17AM -0400, Mike Viau wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:39:51 +0100 wrote: > > > > Sid kernel would be most interesting first off, I think. > > > > Ian. > > Same behaviors after updating the three packages: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64, linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64, and linux-base (2.6.32-21). > > apt-cache policy xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 > xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: > Installed: 2.6.32-21 > Candidate: 2.6.32-21 > Version table: > *** 2.6.32-21 0 > 500 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca sid/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.6.32-20 0 > 990 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca squeeze/main Packages > > apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 > linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: > Installed: 2.6.32-21 > Candidate: 2.6.32-21 > Version table: > *** 2.6.32-21 0 > 500 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca sid/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.6.32-20 0 > 990 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca squeeze/main Packages > > apt-cache policy linux-base > linux-base: > Installed: 2.6.32-21 > Candidate: 2.6.32-21 > Version table: > *** 2.6.32-21 0 > 500 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca sid/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.6.32-20 0 > 990 http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca squeeze/main Packages > > Bare-metal or with hypervisor does not boot with nomodeset on the kernel cmdline. > > Just for troubleshooting purpose the current default Debian squeeze kernel linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 (2.6.32-20) also does not boot when nomodeset is set on the kernel cmdline. > Well, 'nomodeset' I don't think will help b/c you don't have KMS in squeeze (I believe so). The other thing is that you have: Aug 21 09:08:27 BUBBLE kernel: [ 5.046676] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 173.14.25 Thu Jan 28 01:53:43 PST the proprietary NVidia driver loaded. We haven't tried those yet and instead focused on making sure the upstream nouveau drivers work with Xen. Which they do now. I would suggest you boot in runlevel 3, so that X is not started and see if the machine works (as in, you don't see other failures). And if you want X and the NVidia driver (the proprietary one), you might need to take the brunt of debugging it and finding where the NVidia is doing some weird stuff. Or, there is another option, and that to use a back-ported version of 2.6.34 DRM/KMS/TTM driversets which include the nouveau support. (I am right now running with that on a GeForce 8600 GT on Xen 4.1 + latest PVOPS kernel).