All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Sanity check mount flags passed to change_mnt_propagation()
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:26:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100830182629.GA2444@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=400UGaZZNnNaDM-=gF5VrZ=myROZDgS=UnFV0@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:23:51PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> >
> > ? ? ? ?/* Only one propagation flag should be set, and no others */
> > ? ? ? ?if (hweight32(type) != 1
> 
> Guys, stop with "teh crazy".
> 
> What the f*ck kind of expression is that? We don't do this kind of
> crap. Even if it's possible that the compiler might be able to
> optimize it, it's just crazy to call "hweight32()" for something like
> this.
> 
> Please think about what you're really after for a second, and realize
> that "one bit set" is just another way of saying "power of two". And
> then sit back, relax, and realize that there are way better ways to
> say "is this is a power of two" than counting bits, for chrissake!

I considered is_power_of_2() initially but rejected it as not
particularly readable.  But hey, this is VFS code!

-VAL

commit ce3708ab514d850b0d0939f3fa6c64daad306a15
Author: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 26 11:07:22 2010 -0700

    VFS: Sanity check mount flags passed to change_mnt_propagation()
    
    Sanity check the flags passed to change_mnt_propagation().  Exactly
    one flag should be set.  Return EINVAL otherwise.
    
    Userspace can pass in arbitrary combinations of MS_* flags to mount().
    do_change_type() is called if any of MS_SHARED, MS_PRIVATE, MS_SLAVE,
    or MS_UNBINDABLE is set.  do_change_type() clears MS_REC and then
    calls change_mnt_propagation() with the rest of the user-supplied
    flags.  change_mnt_propagation() clearly assumes only one flag is set
    but do_change_type() does not check that this is true.  For example,
    mount() with flags MS_SHARED | MS_RDONLY does not actually make the
    mount shared or read-only but does clear MNT_UNBINDABLE.
    
    Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>

diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index de402eb..ddc5565 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1484,13 +1484,29 @@ out_unlock:
 }
 
 /*
+ * Sanity check the flags to change_mnt_propagation.
+ */
+
+static int flags_to_propagation_type(int flags) {
+	int type = flags & ~MS_REC;
+
+	/* Fail if any non-propagation flags are set */
+	if (type & ~(MS_SHARED | MS_PRIVATE | MS_SLAVE | MS_UNBINDABLE))
+		return 0;
+	/* Only one propagation flag should be set */
+	if (!is_power_of_2(type))
+		return 0;
+	return type;
+}
+
+/*
  * recursively change the type of the mountpoint.
  */
 static int do_change_type(struct path *path, int flag)
 {
 	struct vfsmount *m, *mnt = path->mnt;
 	int recurse = flag & MS_REC;
-	int type = flag & ~MS_REC;
+	int type;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
@@ -1499,6 +1515,10 @@ static int do_change_type(struct path *path, int flag)
 	if (path->dentry != path->mnt->mnt_root)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	type = flags_to_propagation_type(flag);
+	if (!type)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	down_write(&namespace_sem);
 	if (type == MS_SHARED) {
 		err = invent_group_ids(mnt, recurse);

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-30 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-26 20:03 [PATCH] VFS: Sanity check mount flags passed to change_mnt_propagation() Valerie Aurora
2010-08-27  1:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-08-27 17:43   ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-27 17:51     ` Bob Copeland
2010-08-27 17:51       ` Bob Copeland
2010-08-27 18:12       ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-28 10:57       ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-08-28 13:15         ` Bob Copeland
2010-08-28 21:23   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-30 18:26     ` Valerie Aurora [this message]
2010-08-27 10:36 ` Karel Zak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100830182629.GA2444@shell \
    --to=vaurora@redhat.com \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.