From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53080 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqR08-0001Iz-Vq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1OqR03-0001JA-RH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:48 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23316)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1OqR03-0001J2-LI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:35:43 -0400
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:35:39 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from
	cold reset.
Message-ID: <20100831133539.GI10499@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1283152674.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<0a460e01cca4fa24f446c7a715fe6df17d0be9ed.1283152674.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<4C7BAB2A.30608@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100831025808.GA19374@valinux.co.jp>
	<4C7CFEC1.8040204@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100831131449.GG10499@redhat.com>
	<4C7D01B3.4030602@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100831132158.GH10499@redhat.com>
	<4C7D02FB.4030706@codemonkey.ws> <4C7D03C7.9090406@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C7D03C7.9090406@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, alex.williamson@redhat.com

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:29:43PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 08/31/2010 04:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >On 08/31/2010 08:21 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:20:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>On 08/31/2010 08:14 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>>System_reset should do cold reset like it does now.
> >>>Why?
> >>>
> >>Because I should not be forced to restart qemu to bring devices to
> >>initial state.
> >
> >IOW, you use system_reset for debugging purposes to reset the
> >device model.
> >
> >Point taken but functionally speaking, system_reset should map to
> >a RESET signal and from what I can tell in this thread, that's a
> >warm reset.
> >
> 
> Note, for most devices there's no difference.  x86 has INIT and
> RESET, with the keyboard controller RESET signal sometimes wired to
> INIT, and RAM doesn't have RESET.  Otherwise most devices don't see
> a difference.
> 
Actually soft reset is defined as INIT in PIIX4 spec:

Bits 1 and 2 in this register are used by PIIX4 to generate a hard reset
or a soft reset. During a hard reset, PIIX4 asserts CPURST, PCIRST#, and
RSTDRV, as well as reset its core and suspend well logic. During
a soft reset, PIIX4 asserts INIT.

--
			Gleb.