From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Dan Kruchinin <dkruchinin@acm.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] QoS TBF and latency configuration misbehavior
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:36:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901063602.GA6285@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100831223402.GA7101@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:34:02AM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
Hi!
> To Jarek: about the scripts. I do not think something will be broken
> by fixing this error. Eventually, if someone used "latency", he meant
> something about real latency. And even if the value was generated
> using the same wrong logic as tc did, using correct formula would just
> increase limit setting.
As I wrote earlier, I'm more worried about configs based on experience,
not logic. Dan's tests show there could be a difference, and I'm not
sure users cared about the logic, since it wasn't questioned until now.
Btw, there could be considered adding a new, alternative parameter, for
this, like rlatency etc. if it's so crucial. And, of course, it's only
my little "IMHO", I don't insist on anything.
Thanks,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 13:56 [RFC][PATCH] QoS TBF and latency configuration misbehavior Dan Kruchinin
2010-08-31 17:01 ` Dan Kruchinin
2010-08-31 19:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-31 21:00 ` Dan Kruchinin
2010-08-31 21:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-31 21:48 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2010-08-31 22:34 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2010-09-01 6:36 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-09-01 8:40 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2010-09-01 11:29 ` Dan Kruchinin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901063602.GA6285@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=dkruchinin@acm.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.