From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"gorcunov@gmail.com" <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ying.huang@intel.com" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"ming.m.lin@intel.com" <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
"yinghai@kernel.org" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] nmi perf fixes
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:38:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901083808.GH22783@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283309806-21913-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On 31.08.10 22:56:42, Don Zickus wrote:
> Fixes to allow unknown nmis to pass through the perf nmi handler instead
> of being swallowed. Contains patches that are already in Ingo's tree. Added
> here for completeness. Based on ingo/tip
>
> Tested on intel/amd
>
> git pull git://fedorapeople.org/dzickus/
>
> Don Zickus (2):
> [x86] perf: rename nmi variable to avoid clash with entry point
> [x86] perf: fix accidentally ack'ing a second event on intel perf
> counter
>
> Peter Zijlstra (1):
> perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values
>
> Robert Richter (1):
> perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 15 +++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Reviewed and tested. Looks good to me, thanks Don.
-Robert
>
> --
> 1.7.2.2
>
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 2:56 [PATCH 0/4] nmi perf fixes Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] [x86] perf: rename nmi variable to avoid clash with entry point Don Zickus
2010-09-01 2:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] [x86] perf: fix accidentally ack'ing a second event on intel perf counter Don Zickus
2010-09-01 8:38 ` Robert Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901083808.GH22783@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.