From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:53:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_net: Do not implement socketcall, use specific syscalls.
Message-Id: <20100902025356.GB10947@linux-sh.org>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1283305771-31182-2-git-send-email-carmelo.amoroso@st.com>
In-Reply-To: <1283305771-31182-2-git-send-email-carmelo.amoroso@st.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 03:57:09AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Socket syscalls entries are now available in the syscall table,
> so it does not need to implement the multipler syscall.
> It is mapped into the sys_ni_syscall.
> 
I don't see how we can make this sort of change safely, it's part of the
existing ABI. Going forward we can gradually migrate people over to using
the broken out syscalls directly, but we will need to maintain
compatability with old binaries almost indefinitely.