From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
Subject: Re: nfsd deadlock, 2.6.36-rc3
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:55:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902065551.079e297c@notabene> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901165400.GB1201@fieldses.org>
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:54:01 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:39:55AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > I've been pursuing a simple reproducer for an NFS lockup that shows
> > up under stress. There is a bunch of info (some of it extraneous) in
> > http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561210. I can reproduce it by writing
> > loop mounted NFS exports:
> >
> > /etc/fstab: 127.0.0.1:/srv /mnt/srv nfs rw 0 2
> > /etc/exports: /srv 127.0.0.1(rw,insecure,no_subtree_check)
> >
> > See the attached scripts test_master.sh and test_client.sh. I simply
> > repeat './test_master.sh wait' until nfsd locks up, typically within
> > 1-3 cycles, e.g.,
>
> Without looking at the dmesg and scripts carefully to confirm, one
> possible explanation is a deadlock when the server can't allocate memory
> required to service client requests, memory which the client itself
> needs to free by writing back dirty pages, but can't because the server
> isn't processing its writes.
Having looked closely I'd say it is almost certainly this issue.
nfsd thread 1266 is in zone_reclaim waiting on a page to be written out so
the memory can be reused.
The other nfsd threads are blocking on a mutex held by 1266.
The dd processes are waiting for pages to be written to the server
The particular page that 1266 is waiting on is almost certainly a page on an
NFS file, so you have a cyclic deadlock.
>
> For that reason we just don't support loopback mounts--they're OK for
> light testing, but it would be difficult to make them completely robust
> under load.
I wonder if we could use 'containers' to partition available memory between
'nfsd threads' and 'everything else'?? Probably not worth the effort.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 15:39 nfsd deadlock, 2.6.36-rc3 Tim Gardner
2010-09-01 16:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-01 20:55 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-09-01 21:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-01 21:11 ` Tim Gardner
2010-09-01 21:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-02 15:13 ` Tim Gardner
2010-09-08 16:52 ` Tim Gardner
2010-09-08 17:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-03 19:12 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100902065551.079e297c@notabene \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.