All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@web.de>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Always synchronize rcu's on module shutdown
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:37:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100906123745.GB13669@Sellars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009061407.59606.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>

> So I would ack the patch with a minor change in the commit message. So instead 
> of
> 
> > During the module shutdown procedure in batman_exit(), a rcu callback is
> > being scheduled (batman_exit -> hardif_remove_interfaces ->
> > hardif_remove_interfae -> call_rcu). However, when the kernel unloads
> > the module, the rcu callback might not have been executed yet, resulting
> > in a "unable to handle kernel paging request" in __rcu_process_callback
> > afterwards, causing the kernel to freeze.
> > Therefore, we should always flush all rcu callback functions scheduled
> > during the shutdown procedure.
> 
> something like
> 
> > During the module shutdown procedure in batman_exit(), a rcu callback is                                                                                                                                  
> > being scheduled (batman_exit -> hardif_remove_interfaces ->                                                                                                                                               
> > hardif_remove_interfae -> call_rcu). However, when the kernel unloads                                                                                                                                     
> > the module, the rcu callback might not have been executed yet, resulting                                                                                                                                  
> > in a "unable to handle kernel paging request" in __rcu_process_callback                                                                                                                                   
> > afterwards, causing the kernel to freeze.                                                                                                                                                                 
>                                                                                                                                                                                                           
> > The synchronize_net and synchronize_rcu in mesh_free are currently                                                                                                                                        
> > called before the call_rcu in hardif_remove_interface and have no real                                                                                                                                    
> > effect on it.                                                                                                                                                                                             
>                                                                                                                                                                                                           
> > Therefore, we should always flush all rcu callback functions scheduled                                                                                                                                    
> > during the shutdown procedure using synchronize_net. The call to                                                                                                                                          
> > synchronize_rcu can be omitted because synchronize_net already calls it.

Yep, sounds good :). Thanks for reviewing and the info about
synchronize_net.

Cheers, Linus

> 
> thanks,
> 	Sven



  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-06 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-05 23:29 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Always synchronize rcu's on module shutdown Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06  7:30 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 10:09   ` Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06 12:07     ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 12:37       ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2010-09-06 12:45         ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] " Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 14:09           ` Marek Lindner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100906123745.GB13669@Sellars \
    --to=linus.luessing@web.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.